Thursday, February 23, 2012

This is really sad.

Rick Santorum, as I suspected, is currently imploding based on his miserable voting record in congress. Ron Paul is collecting the "insane and uninformed" vote. Gengrich, who is the only viable candidate to face El Presidente' in the general election is still trying to reinvent himself.

That leaves Romney. Oh God. The man who runs based on "they hate me less than they hate Obama". This does not look good for our country.

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

The Florida Primary

According to the pundits the Florida Primary "proved that Mitt Romney is the decided frontrunner and likely GOP Nominee." But looking at the numbers is that what it really shows?

Mitt Romney had 764,000 votes. Gingrich was at 531,000. That's a spread of 233,000 votes. Where are those votes : Santorum - 222,000 and Ron Paul had 116,000. Looking at it this way it's clears Santorum and Paul need to drop out. All they are doing is splitting the vote and nominating Romney.

So what's wrong with Romney? Look back at Mass when he was governor. He raised taxes, instituted Romney Care chopped emergency services and left office with the State in Financial Ruin. Who does that sound like? obama. I can't hear you. Obama. I still can't hear you. OBAMA. How does one tell Obama and Romney apart?

Friday, January 20, 2012

Mitt Romeny

ANY BODY BUT ROMNEY!!!

Saturday, January 14, 2012

Indiana hopes to avoid fraud in GOP primary

Would someone please pull their head out of their ass? This is some big stink raised by Democrats resulting from voter fraud allegations during the 2008 elections. Oh, the Democrats are screaming for blood if those filthy Republicans commit any voter fraud this year. But remember, in 2008 it was DEMOCRATS who turned in phoney petitions, paid voters to register many times in different districts and under numerous names.

With all this screaming are we not supposed to watch the Democrats this year? I somehow doubt that skunk has changed it's stripes.

Saturday, January 7, 2012

Gengrich vs The Media

I find it very interesting that Newt Gengrich was lambasted by both sides because of his divorce and the rumors of infidelity. What really bothers me is JFK and Bill Clinton's infidelity that seems to have been approved by the press.

Is this another case of Media bias?

In addition, Governor Mormon jumped on the bandwagon too. I really don't find this very surprising since Romney is really a democrat in Sheep's clothing.

It's fine that Michelle (Nut Case) Bauchman fell off the campaign. She had no chance and her screechy voice drives me nuts. But why is Huntsman still in?

Monday, October 3, 2011

Obama's jobs bill falls to pieces in Congress

Reading into this story,

"As Obama continued to press lawmakers for a vote on his signature legislation, Representative Eric Cantor, the No. 2 House Republican, said that was not going to happen.
Asked if the bill as a complete package was dead, Cantor said: "Yes.""
Now Obama will think this gives him some ammo to use against those filthy conservatives who dare to defy him. But the story goes on:
"The bill appeared to be in trouble in the Democratic-controlled Senate as well, where aides from both parties said it will likely fail when it comes up for a vote later this month."
Now how is he going to blame the failure of his "Bipartisan bill" on the failure in the Senate?
Go back in recent history and recall how this bill came about.
After months of bad employment reports, someone in the White House woke up to the fact that Employment was going to be a major issue in the 2012 general election. So someone quickly drafted a speech for the "Speech-Give-in-Chief" and he blindly (and through some obvious stupid political planing called a joint session of congress the day they returned from Summer Vacation and the same day on which the first Republic Debate was scheduled. That was another failure in policy. So the speech was rescheduled.
The Obama made this wonderful speech promising a "bill on Monday" that everyone would like. On Monday essentially a white paper showed up in Congress outlining Obama's spending plan. But where was the bill? How was it to be funded?
The skinny on the street was the Obama White House went to the "super committee" and told them they had to fund his bill by finding an additional $450 billions in cost cuts. That was another failure on the part of the White House. And where is that pesky bill and how is it to be funded?
Two weeks later some of the White House staff stayed up late and drafted the bill including everything the Democrats and Obama wanted and the Republicans had already said they would vote down in the House, as well as, everything the Republicans wanted which the Senate Leadership had already said would die in the Senate. Someone in the White House isn't listening.
So finally when people start reading the bill in the midst of Obama demanding all over the country while campaigning, "PASS THIS BILL!" it turns out to be another Solyndra-style boondoggle funded by a $500 Billion tax hike (on someone, though we can't be sure who at this point).
As an interesting sidebar, I find it hilarious that Obama has redefined "infrastructure" to mean "Solar Panels". How in the world did he do that without telling anyone?
All in all, I never really expected Obama ever thought his cobbled together mess AKA Jobs Bill would ever pass either the House or the Senate. Instead it was only another phoney political move to try to drum up something to blame on the Republicans and make points in the coming election.

With Jobs Bill Stalled, Obama Camp Takes Aim at Potential 2012 Rivals

This strikes me odd in two ways. First remember back to the 2008 election when Obama claimed he was "the only candidate who can work with both sides of the aisle"? It strikes me as total truth until the 2010 midterm elections when the opposition took over the House. Up to that time the other side was completely ignored.

Secondly, if you have been following the Amanda Knox trial in Italy, with all the "hard evidence" discredited leaving only "hear say" and inference, the prosecution has resorted to name-calling and character assassination to convict Ms Knox a second time. Judged on the facts the prosecution's case is very thin, indeed. So what is Obama doing in his bid for re-election? Name-calling and character assassination. How very odd. It would appear the Obama administration now believes their case for creating jobs or salvaging the economy is just as thin as the Prosecutor in Italy's Knox trial.

What I see is this:
1. The hard line Liberal Democrats who have been brainwashed into believing big government will solve anything will vote for him in 2012. Although this group is shrinking and murmuring about running an alternate candidate against Obama.
2. The blacks will vote for him, not in the issues, but because he's black. But the blacks are disassitfied with Obama too. Since November, 2008, the black community has been essentially ignored until just a few weeks ago when Obama figured out he needed to shore up the black vote.
3. Obama has lost many of the Independents according to the latest polls. I don't see Obama being able to do much to bring them back without creating a few million jobs and re-energizing the economy. Neither of those are likely to happen.

This is what happens when a dictator encounters an opposition who disagrees with him.